Government Contractor IT | Empowering Technology Solutions LLC

This Requirement Now Gates The Contract Itself

Every other regulation punishes you afterward. This one decides whether you are eligible. No score in the system, no certification at the required level, and the solicitation is closed to you.

The other half is what you attested to. A score posted optimistically is a representation to the government, and that is a considerably more serious category of problem than a failed audit.

What Our Government Contractor IT Does For You

Your SPRS score reflects reality, which matters more than the number.
Scope gets drawn tightly, so the whole company is not in scope.
The system security plan describes what you actually run today.
Flow-down clauses from your primes get read before you sign them.
Incident reporting deadlines are known, because the clock is 72 hours.
Every control has evidence behind it, not just a claim on a form.
We respond to support requests and general inquiries in under thirty minutes.

What Clients Say About Us

Fast, Reliable Support Around the Clock

Working with ETS for about a year now, I've had a great experience every time I've contacted them for support and during our new product implementation. They have been flexible when needed and quickly responsive each time we've reached out for support. Employees are great to work with, very respectful and courteous, and at understanding our issue fully before providing possible solutions. I appreciate this company and their employees.

JOSH WRYE

A Trustworthy, Transparent Partner

I could not be happier with ETS. They are always just a phone call or e-mail away to handle our IT issues 24/7. Most of my tickets have been answered AND completed within an hour. Brian has gone above and beyond to make sure we understand our options and how they are going to be implemented. ETS has exceeded my expectations. No question or project is too small or too big for them. You may also think to yourself “Do I need an IT solution?” and the answer is YES and the company is ETS.

KATIE KASSING

Proactive IT Partnership That Exceeds Expectations

We have had the privilege of working with Empowering Technology Solutions for almost two years, and I can confidently say they have exceeded every expectation we had of a managed services partner. From the outset, they demonstrated a deep understanding of both our technical requirements and the strategic objectives of our business. Their team is consistently responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive. Whether it's day-to-day support requests, complex infrastructure projects, or critical incident response, they have delivered with professionalism and precision every step of the way. Their ability to translate technical challenges into actionable business solutions has been instrumental in reducing downtime, improving security posture, and increasing operational efficiency across our organization. What truly sets Empowering Technology Solutions apart is their commitment to partnership. They don’t operate as an outsourced vendor; they function as a true extension of our internal team. Their leadership maintains regular touchpoints with our executive staff, offering transparency, forward-thinking insights, and clear roadmaps for continuous improvement. This strategic engagement has enabled us to stay ahead of emerging technologies and regulatory requirements. In a landscape filled with reactive service providers, Empowering Technology Solutions is a rare find: a proactive, value-driven partner that consistently delivers excellence. I highly recommend them to any organization seeking a reliable, forward-thinking, and results-oriented IT MSP.

JOSEPH PROVENZANO

Responsive, Professional, and Reliable Support

Empowering Technology Solutions (ETS) has been an invaluable partner in managing the IT services for our multiple specialty clinics. Their team is consistently quick to respond, ensuring that any issues or concerns are addressed promptly and effectively. Their proactive approach to IT management has minimized downtime and enhanced the overall efficiency of our operations. What sets ETS apart is their unwavering commitment to providing tailored solutions that meet our specific needs. Whether it’s a complex network configuration or routine maintenance, ETS approaches each task with professionalism and expertise. Their knowledgeable staff are always ready to offer support, ensuring our IT infrastructure remains robust and reliable. The level of service provided by ETS goes beyond just meeting expectations; they consistently exceed them. Their ability to anticipate potential issues and implement preemptive measures has saved us time and resources. It's evident that ETS values our partnership and strives to deliver exceptional service at every opportunity. We highly recommend Empowering Technology Solutions to any organization seeking a responsive, innovative, and dedicated IT service provider. Their comprehensive approach to IT management and customer-centric focus make them a standout choice for any business looking to enhance their technological capabilities.

A A.

A Truly Dependable IT Company

We were lucky enough to find ETS years ago when our current IT company couldn't help us anymore. They are an amazing company with an amazing team. They are very organized and know their field. We have many different software programs that integrate with our main software, and we never have a major issue. It has been wonderful having a company that is so dependable, especially in the IT space where so many companies don't know what they are doing. We happily get to focus on our work rather than the latest IT issue. If you are looking for a company, give ETS a call, you will be so happy you do! :)

JUDY H

How We Make The Requirement Manageable For You

The reason CMMC costs small contractors so much is scope. Applied to an entire company, one hundred and ten controls is a project you cannot afford. Applied to a properly drawn boundary around the work that actually touches CUI, it becomes achievable.

We Draw The Boundary First

Scoping comes before anything else, because it decides the cost of everything after it. Most of your company can usually sit outside the boundary, which is where money gets saved.

The Score Is Defensible

A posted score is a representation to the government, so ours get built from what is actually configured. An optimistic number is an entirely different kind of risk to carry.

Every Control Has Proof

Each control gets evidence attached: a configuration record, a policy, a log, a screenshot. An assessor is checking whether the claim is supported, not whether you merely sound organized.

The Plan Has Real Dates

Unmet controls belong on a plan of action with owners and dates, which the rules permit. What is not permitted is claiming an implementation you have not actually completed yet.

CMMC Readiness and SPRS Scoring

Knowing What Your Actual Score Is Before Anybody Else

A self-assessment score gets posted to a government system and it follows you. Contractors who scored themselves optimistically are now discovering that the number is a representation, and that closing the gap between the claim and the configuration is the entire job. We work the other direction: assess what is actually in place against the one hundred and ten controls, calculate the score honestly, then build a plan that raises it in a defensible order.

The order matters as much as the work. Controls that affect the score heavily and cost little go first, and controls that require a genuine project get owners and dates on a plan of action, which the rules explicitly allow. What nobody should do is post a number and hope, because that is the version with False Claims Act exposure attached to it.

The score gets calculated from what is actually configured, not from what somebody hoped.
Controls get sequenced by score impact against cost, so the number moves early on.
Unmet controls go onto a plan of action with owners and dates, which is allowed.

CUI Enclave Design and Scoping

The Single Decision That Sets Every Other Cost After It

Scoping is where small contractors either save themselves a fortune or lose one. If controlled unclassified information moves freely across the whole business, then the whole business is in the assessment, and you are applying defense-grade controls to a reception desk. If it can be confined to a defined enclave with a small number of people and systems inside it, everything else sits outside the boundary. The engineering work is the same. The bill is not.

Getting this right means understanding how the work actually flows: who receives drawings from the prime, where they get stored, which machines read them, and who emails what to whom. That is a process conversation before it is a technical one, and it is also where an external provider’s own scope gets decided, so it is worth settling early.

Scope gets defined by how the work actually flows, rather than by your org chart.
People and systems that never touch controlled information stay outside the boundary.
The boundary decision gets made before anything at all is purchased or rebuilt.

Incident Reporting and Evidence Requirements

The Reporting Clock Runs Seventy Two Hours, Not A Week

Defense contracts carry a reporting obligation most commercial businesses do not have: a cyber incident affecting covered information has to be reported to the Department of Defense within seventy two hours of discovery. That requires a medium assurance certificate obtained in advance, evidence preserved rather than cleaned up, and often malicious software submitted for analysis. None of that can be arranged during the incident, which is exactly when contractors find out.

So it gets arranged beforehand. The certificate exists, the reporting route is written down with who does it, and the response procedure preserves images and logs instead of rebuilding the machine because somebody wanted it working again. Preserving evidence and restoring service pull against each other, and that order has to be decided before anybody is under pressure.

The medium assurance certificate gets obtained well in advance, not during an incident.
Evidence and logs get preserved first, before anybody rebuilds the affected machine.
Who reports it, and how, is written down while nobody is under any pressure.

Why Contractors Start This Earlier Than Planned

Almost nobody starts this work voluntarily. It begins when a prime asks a question, a solicitation lists a level, or a teaming agreement arrives with a clause attached to it. By then the timeline belongs to somebody else entirely, and not to you.

Scope Sets The Cost

Scope gets decided before anything is bought, because it sets every cost that follows. Confining controlled information to a defined enclave keeps most of your own company outside the boundary and outside the assessment process entirely.

The Score Is Real

Your posted score is built from what is actually configured rather than from optimism. It is a representation to the government, which puts it in a far more serious category than an ordinary internal compliance document.

Evidence Sits Behind It

Every control carries evidence behind it: configuration records, policies, logs. An assessor is testing whether each claim is supported, and a system security plan with no evidence underneath it does not survive that test at all.

Streamlined Audits

Our white-glove support keeps you functional, secure and confidently compliant through assessment windows. Thirty minutes is our response commitment, extended hours cover the long evenings this work always runs into, and every single ticket gets rated afterward.

FAQs About Our IT Services for Government Contractors

Do You Assess Us, Or Do We Still Need A Separate C3PAO?

You need a separate accredited assessor, and you should be wary of any provider who suggests otherwise. Certification at the level that requires a third-party assessment has to be performed by an authorized assessor organization, precisely because the firm that built your environment cannot credibly certify it. What we do is everything up to that boundary: scoping, implementation, the system security plan, the evidence, the plan of action, and sitting with you during the assessment itself. Self-assessment at the lower level is different, and we support that directly.

How Do We Know Whether We Actually Handle Any CUI At All?

By looking at what your primes actually send you, which is usually more revealing than reading the contract. Drawings, specifications, technical data packages, and process instructions are the common ones, and they frequently arrive by email with no marking at all, which is part of the problem. The practical test is whether losing that information would matter to the government rather than just to you. If the answer is unclear, the flow-down clauses in your subcontract are the place to start, and they are worth reading before the next award rather than after.

Does Using You As Our Provider Put You In Our Assessment Scope?

It depends entirely on the enclave design, and it is the right question to ask any provider. An external service provider that stores, processes, or transmits controlled information generally comes into scope, whereas one supporting systems outside the boundary does not. That is one of the reasons the scoping conversation happens first rather than last, because the answer changes both your cost and ours. We will tell you plainly which side of the line our involvement sits on for your particular setup, and design it deliberately rather than discovering it during an assessment.

What Actually Happens If We Report An Incident To The DoD Late?

The obligation is contractual, so the exposure is contractual: you have failed to meet a term of the agreement, which can affect the current contract and your standing for future awards. In practice the bigger problem is what late reporting usually indicates, which is that nobody knew the requirement existed, the certificate was never obtained, and the evidence was destroyed while somebody rebuilt the machine to get production moving again. That combination is much harder to explain than the delay itself, and all of it is avoidable in advance.

You Deserve A Higher Quality of IT Support...

Most owners find out how thin their security was on the day it fails, and how slow their IT company is on the same day. You can find out now instead, on a call that costs nothing, from somebody who will say it plainly.

Call (702) 874-3767 today or fill out the form below to see firsthand what white-glove IT services look like.

schedule a call

IT Services for Government Contractors